What Paid Search Bid Strategy Should You Use
A Practical Guide
Choosing the right bid strategy is one of the most important decisions you’ll make in paid search. It directly impacts performance, efficiency, and how much control you have over your campaigns.
This post focuses specifically on paid search bidding strategies (primarily Google Ads, with some notes where Microsoft Ads differs). Google offers a wide range of bidding options, and while that flexibility is powerful, it can also be overwhelming.
The most important thing to understand upfront is this:
The “best” bid strategy depends entirely on what you’re trying to achieve.
Before touching a bid setting, you need clarity on your primary goal — scale, efficiency, revenue, awareness, or control. Different bid strategies offer different tradeoffs between automation and control, and choosing the wrong one can quietly sabotage your results.
Below, I’ll walk through the major bid strategy categories, their pros and cons, and when each one makes sense.
Understanding Bid Strategy Categories
At a high level, paid search bid strategies fall into four buckets, each with a different level of automation and control:

- Manual bidding
Maximum control, no automation - Automated bidding with constraints
Target CPA and Target ROAS - Fully automated bidding
Maximize conversions, revenue, or clicks - Awareness and visibility bidding
Target impression share
Each can be effective — when used in the right context.
Manual CPC Bidding: Maximum Control
Manual CPC bidding is the original, tried-and-true approach. It’s where many experienced search marketers started, and for good reason.

How it works
You manually set bids at the keyword level and can layer on bid adjustments by:
- Device
- Time of day
- Location
- Audience
Pros
- Full transparency and control
- Easier to diagnose performance issues
- Useful when data volume is low
- Ideal for testing new keywords or campaigns
- Still very effective in Microsoft Ads
Cons
- Time-intensive to manage at scale
- Does not leverage Google’s real-time auction signals
- Increasingly deprioritized by Google’s platform design
While Google rarely says outright that advertisers shouldn’t use manual bidding, the platform is clearly optimized around automation. Features like broad match expansion, Performance Max, and value-based bidding all work best with automated strategies. In practice, many advertisers see weaker performance and fewer optimization levers when sticking exclusively to manual CPC in Google Ads.
When to use it
- New or low-volume campaigns
- When campaigns need to scale up or scale down quickly
- Microsoft Ads, where manual control is still powerful
- Short-term testing or learning phases
Target CPA Bidding: Optimizing to a Fixed Outcome
Target CPA (cost per acquisition) bidding tells Google to optimize bids so that, on average, conversions hit a specific cost.
How it works
You define a conversion action (lead, signup, application, etc.) and set a CPA target. Google uses historical data and real-time signals to adjust bids dynamically.
Pros
- Reduces the need for constant bid management
- Helps maintain efficiency while scaling
- Useful when each conversion has roughly equal value
- Saves time for mature accounts
Cons
- Requires sufficient conversion volume to work well
- Learning periods can be volatile
- CPA may fluctuate even if the “average” looks stable
- Overly aggressive targets can restrict volume
This strategy works best for advertisers with a clear, static value per conversion — for example, lead gen programs where each lead is worth approximately the same amount.
When to use it
- You have consistent conversion volume
- You know what you can afford per conversion
- You want to scale thoughtfully without micromanaging bids
- Operational efficiency matters as much as performance
Target ROAS Bidding: Optimizing for Revenue, Not Volume

Target ROAS (return on ad spend) is designed for advertisers whose conversions have variable value.
How it works
Instead of optimizing toward a cost, you feed conversion values back to Google (purchase revenue, policy value, subscription tier, etc.). Google then bids to hit a target return on ad spend.
Pros
- Optimizes toward revenue, not just conversions
- Accounts for high- vs. low-value customers
- Strong efficiency gains over time
- Ideal for ecommerce and value-based funnels
Cons
- Requires accurate conversion value tracking
- Can limit volume if ROAS targets are too aggressive
- Not ideal for early-stage or low-data accounts
ROAS bidding is excellent for efficiency but not always for rapid scale. If your goal is “most revenue possible at a specific return,” this strategy shines. If your goal is growth at all costs, it can feel restrictive.
When to use it
- Ecommerce or variable-value conversions
- Strong tracking infrastructure
- Focus on profitability over pure scale
- Mature accounts with stable data
Maximize Bidding: Fully Automated, Minimal Control
Maximize strategies (Maximize Conversions, Maximize Conversion Value, Maximize Clicks) give Google near-total control.
How it works
You set a budget, and Google bids aggressively to get the most conversions, value, or traffic possible within that budget — without strict efficiency constraints.
Pros
- Extremely hands-off
- Fast to launch
- Useful when budget is fixed
- Leverages full auction-time optimization
Cons
- No control over CPA or ROAS
- Can overspend on low-quality conversions
- Limited transparency into decision-making

This approach works best when your budget is the primary constraint, not efficiency. Think of it as telling Google, “Spend this money as effectively as you can — I trust you.”
When to use it
- Fixed budgets with clear spend limits
- Low conversion density
- Short-term campaigns
- When speed and simplicity matter
Target Impression Share: Awareness and Visibility
Target impression share focuses on where and how often your ads appear, not on performance efficiency.
How it works
You tell Google the percentage of impressions you want and where you want to appear:
- Anywhere on the page
- Top of page
- Absolute top of page
Pros
- Strong visibility and volume
- Excellent for brand protection
- Useful for competitive markets
- Predictable presence
Cons
- Can become very expensive, very quickly
- Not performance-driven
- Easy to overspend without guardrails
This strategy is especially common for branded campaigns, where maintaining top-of-page visibility is more important than efficiency.
When to use it
- Brand defense campaigns
- Competitive brand terms
- Short-term awareness pushes
- Situations where visibility > efficiency
Final Thoughts: Start With the Goal, Not the Setting
There is no universally “best” bid strategy — only the one that aligns with your business objective, data maturity, and risk tolerance.
Before selecting a bid type, ask:
- Am I optimizing for scale, efficiency, revenue, or visibility?
- Do my conversions have equal or variable value?
- Do I have enough data to support automation?
- How much control do I actually need?
Bid strategies are tools, not shortcuts. When chosen intentionally, they can unlock meaningful performance gains. When chosen blindly, they can quietly drain budget.
If you get the goal right first, the bid strategy choice becomes much easier — and far more effective.
Need help determining which bid strategy to use? Visit the contact page to get in touch.
